THE TECHNIQUES OF URBAN ECONOMIC ANALYSES

A COMPILATION OF STATEMENTS BY WELL-KNOW CITY PLANNERS AND ECONOMISTS IN SUPPORT OF, AND AGAINST, THE ECONOMIC BASE THEORY IS PRESENTED. THE INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH IS OFFERED AS AN ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGY. EXPLANATIONS OF THE BASE THEORY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ARE GIVEN BY RICHARD B. ANDREWS, ARTHUR M. WEINER, HOMER HOYT, AND JOHN W. ALEXANDER. OBJECTIONS TO THE ECONOMIC BASE THEORY ARE STATED BY JAMES GILLIES, WILLIAM GRIGSBY, HANS BLUMENFELD, RALPH W. PFOUTS, ERLE T. CURTIS, CHARLES E. FERGUSEN, AND CHARLES M. TIEBOUT. THE INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH IS DISCUSSED BY WALTER ISARD AND ROBERT KAVESH, ABE GOTTLIEB, AND CHARLES M. TIEBOUT.

  • Corporate Authors:

    CHANDLER-DAVIS PUB. CO.

    WEST TRENTON, N.J.,
    ,    
  • Authors:
    • Pfouts, R W
  • Publication Date: 1960

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00201433
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Report/Paper Numbers: 410 pp
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Jul 22 1994 12:00AM