DECRIMINALIZATION: ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION. VOLUME II: DISCUSSION, INTERPRETATION AND APPENDICES

The primary goal of this research study is to compare the relative 'fairness,' 'efficiency,' and 'effectiveness' of decriminalized administrative adjudication processes in two geographic areas, (Buffalo, New York and the State of North Dakota) with traditional adjudication programs in similar geographic areas (Syracuse, New York and the State of South Dakota, respectively). To accomplish this goal, information common to all selection sites was identified, collected and analyzed to determine if significant differences in impact existed on a series of criterion measures, the type and degree of impact, and whether obtained differences were attributable to specific causative factors. This report is produced in three volumes: Volume I contains the Analysis and Findings; Volume II contains the Discussion, Summary, Conclusions, and Appendices; Volume III is a Special Summary Report.

  • Supplemental Notes:
    • Sponsored in part by Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, DC. Portions of this document are not fully legible. See also Volume 1 PB-292 809 and Volume 3, PB-292 811. Also available in set of 3 reports PC E09, PB-292 808-SET.
  • Corporate Authors:

    PRC Systems Sciences Company

    7600 Old Springhouse Road
    McLean, VA  USA  22101

    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
    Washington, DC  USA  20590

    Urban Mass Transportation Administration

    400 7th Street, SW
    Washington, DC  USA  20590
  • Authors:
    • WAGNER, M
    • Goldsamt, M
    • Lester, N
  • Publication Date: 1978-7-31

Media Info

  • Pagination: 109 p.

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00191453
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Source Agency: National Technical Information Service
  • Report/Paper Numbers: PRC-R-1857-VOL-2, DOT-HS-803-796
  • Contract Numbers: DOT-HS-6-01285
  • Files: NTIS, USDOT
  • Created Date: May 26 2002 12:00AM