COMPARISON OF PEDESTRIAN SUBSYSTEMS SAFETY TESTS USING IMPACTORS AND FULL-SCALE DUMMY TESTS. IN: AUTOMOTIVE CRASH RESEARCH: SIDE IMPACT, ROLLOVER, AND VEHICLE AGGRESSIVITY

This paper describes how the evaluation of car front aggressiveness in car-pedestrian accidents is typically done using sub-system tests. Three of theses tests have been proposed by EEVC/WG17, and the are: (1) the legform to bumper tests; (2) the upper legform to bonnet leading edge test; and (3) the headform to bonnet top test. These tests were developed in order to evaluate the performance of the car structure at car to pedestrian impact speed of 11.1 m/s, and each of them has its own impactor, impact conditions and injury criteria. However, it has not been determined yet as to what extent the EEVC sub-system tests represent real-world pedestrian accidents. Therefore there are two objectives of this study. First, to clarify the differences between the injury-related responses of full-scale pedestrian dummy and results of sub-system tests obtained under impact conditions simulating car-to-pedestrian accidents. Second to propose modifications of current sub-system test methods.

Language

  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00929472
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0768009391
  • Report/Paper Numbers: SP-1671
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Aug 28 2002 12:00AM