THE EFFECT OF FALSE FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS ON DRIVER RESPONSES

Forward Collision Warning Systems (FCWS) are being developed as a countermeasure for the large number of rear-end crashes that occur on public roads each year (about 1.5 million per year). Although indications are that FCWS will benefit drivers in imminent collision scenarios, very little is known about how drivers respond to false collision warnings. A field experiment was designed to investigate the effects of false FCWs on driver responses. Sixteen drivers (9 Younger and 7 Older) were presented with correct warnings (CW) and false warnings (FW) while driving along a pre-defined route on public roads. On all correct warning trials and half of the false warning trials drivers were distracted by a speed monitoring task when the warnings were presented. The results were analyzed with speed adjustments brake response time (BRT) and in-vehicle task RT as dependent measures and Age, Block, and Trial Type as independent variables. Results show that drivers brake in response to false warnings. The likelihood of braking decreased as drivers experienced more false warning. Undistracted drivers stopped responding to false warnings after only a few exposures. However, when the same drivers received false warnings while distracted, drivers continued to respond to FWs regardless of prior FW exposures

  • Supplemental Notes:
    • Publication Date: 2002. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. Remarks: Paper 02-2274 prepared for presentation at the 81st annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. January 2002. Format: CD ROM
  • Corporate Authors:

    Jamiat al-Imarat al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah

    ,    

    University of California, Berkeley

    California PATH Program, Institute of Transportation Studies
    Richmond Field Station, 1357 South 46th Street
    Richmond, CA  United States  94804-4648

    University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

    Department of Civil Engineering, 500 Pillsbury Drive, SE
    Minneapolis, MN  United States  55455

    University of California, Irvine

    Institute of Transportation Studies
    4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building
    Irvine, CA  United States  92697

    Purdue University

    Joint Transportation Research Program
    West Lafayette, IN  United States  47907-2051

    Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

    1005 North Glebe Road
    Arlington, VA  United States  22201

    Texas Transportation Institute

    Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU
    College Station, TX  United States  77843-3135

    CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY

    CHICAGO, IL  United States 

    University of Utah, Salt Lake City

    Utah Traffic Laboratory, 122 S Central Campus Drive
    Salt Lake City, UT  United States  84112

    University of Toronto

    Intelligent Transportation Systems Center
    Toronto, Ontario  Canada 

    University of Hawaii, Manoa

    Department of Civil Engineering, 2540 Dole Street, Holmes Hall 383
    Honolulu, HI  United States  96822
  • Authors:
    • Gish, Kenneth W
    • Mercadante, Michael
    • Perel, Michael
    • Barickman, Frank
  • Conference:
  • Date: 2002

Language

  • English

Media Info

  • Pagination: 23 p.

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00922111
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Source Agency: UC Berkeley Transportation Library
  • Files: PATH
  • Created Date: Apr 2 2002 12:00AM