LONG TERM ENERGY ALTERNATIVES FOR AUTOMOTIVE PROPULSION. SYNTHETIC FUEL VERSUS BATTERY/ELECTRIC SYSTEM
Conventional automobiles deriving fuel from coal by coal liquefaction processes are compared with electric cars using advanced batteries (such as the high temperature lithium-sulfur battery). Four comparison criteria--ease of transition from the present system, economics, energy requirements and environmental quality--were applied.
- See also PB-262 513.
Stanford Research Institute333 Ravenswood Avenue
Menlo Park, CA USA 94025
National Science FoundationDivision of Policy Research and Analysis, 1800 G Street, NW
Washington, DC USA 20550
- Hughes, E E
- Walton, B L
- Newgard, P M
- RYAN, J W
- Steele, R V
- Publication Date: 1976-8
- Pagination: 281 p.
- TRT Terms: Air pollution; Alternatives analysis; Automobiles; Automotive engineering; Coal; Cost estimating; Economics; Electric automobiles; Electric batteries; Energy; Energy consumption; Environmental engineering; Estimates; Liquefaction; Motor fuels; Propulsion; Synthetic fuels; Transportation; Vehicle power plants
- Uncontrolled Terms: Propulsion systems
- Old TRIS Terms: Energy requirements; Substitutes
- Subject Areas: Economics; Energy; Geotechnology; Materials; Society; Transportation (General);
- Accession Number: 00154604
- Record Type: Publication
- Source Agency: National Technical Information Service
- Report/Paper Numbers: SRI-EGU-4064-FR Final Rpt., NSF/PRA-7516162/2/6
- Files: TRIS
- Created Date: May 31 1977 12:00AM