ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRANSPORTATION
Labor arbitrators are often called upon to decide whether an employer's decision to dismiss or suspend an employee with an alcohol or drug abuse problem is an infraction of the collective bargaining agreement. This study is an attempt to better understand labor arbitration in the transportation industry. Results of the study supported an Arbitration Decision Model and revealed several unexpected relationships. Employees responsible for public safety who have prior arrests, are members of a large union or are members of the Teamsters are likely to be treated more severely by arbitrators. Interestingly, employees in non-safety sensitive positions who have prior arrests, are members of large unions or who are members of the Teamsters, are not more likely to be treated differently by arbitrators. While previous research suggests that arbitrators are more lenient in cases of drug abuse than in cases involving alcohol, this study does not support that conclusion.
-
Corporate Authors:
Transportation Research Forum
11250-8 Roger Bacon Drive, Suite 8
Reston, VA United States 20190 -
Authors:
- Strasser, S
- Hires, J M
-
Conference:
- Transportation Research Forum, 36th Annual Conference, 2 volumes
- Location: Daytona Beach, Florida
- Date: 1994-11-3 to 1994-11-5
- Publication Date: 1994
Language
- English
Media Info
- Features: Figures; References; Tables;
- Pagination: p. 747-757
Subject/Index Terms
- TRT Terms: Alcohol abuse; Arbitration; Arrests; Collective bargaining; Drug abuse; Employees; Labor; Labor unions; Safety; Transportation; Truck drivers
- Identifier Terms: International Brotherhood of Teamsters
- Old TRIS Terms: Disciplinary actions; Teamsters union
- Subject Areas: Safety and Human Factors; Transportation (General); I83: Accidents and the Human Factor;
Filing Info
- Accession Number: 00727098
- Record Type: Publication
- Report/Paper Numbers: Volume 2
- Files: TRIS
- Created Date: Oct 22 1996 12:00AM