By far the greatest amount of welding in all structures consists of longitudinal welds used to join components of axially loaded members so that they will act in unison to form effective and stable structural members. Many designers opt to use complete joint penetration groove welds "just to be safe" when other weld types or combinations of welds would be a better choice in terms of limiting residual stress and distortion, avoiding lamellar tears, and reducing the cost of welding and fabrication. Since all properly designed continuous longitudinal welds of good quality have the same static life and same fatigue life, why do designers think it is safer to use complete joint penetration groove welds? This paper examines the choices available to engineers in designing longitudinal web-to-flange welded joints in I-shape and box-shape members and endeavors to briefly discuss materials, design, and welding information that affects that choice.

  • Availability:
  • Corporate Authors:

    American Institute of Steel Construction

    Wrigley Building, 400 North Michigan Avenue, 8th Floor
    Chicago, IL  United States  60611

    World Bank

    1818 H Street, NW
    Washington, DC  United States  20433
  • Authors:
    • Alexander, W G
  • Publication Date: 1991

Media Info

  • Features: Figures; References;
  • Pagination: p. 29-36
  • Serial:
    • Engineering Journal
    • Volume: 28
    • Issue Number: 1
    • Publisher: American Institute of Steel Construction
    • ISSN: 0013-8029

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00607489
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0-8213-1756-3
  • Report/Paper Numbers: Discussion Paper 115
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Apr 30 1991 12:00AM