IMPACT PERFORMANCE AND A SELECTION CRITERION FOR TEXAS MEDIAN BARRIERS
The impact performance of the Texas Metal Beam Guard Fence median barrier (MBGF) was determined and compared with that of the Texas Concrete Median Barrier (CMB). The MBGF consists of two standard W-shaped guardrails mounted back-to-back on a 6 WF 8.5 support post whereas the CMB is a solid concrete barrier. The impact performance of the MBGF was determined from a combination of crash tests and from crash simulations by the Highway-Vehicle-Object-Simulation-Model (HVOSM). Full-size automobiles (approximately 4,000 lb) were used in both the crash tests and the crash simulations. A close comparison of test and simulated results verified the accuracy of the HVOSM in simulating impacts with the MBGF. The impact performance of the CMB was obtained from another study.
- Prepared in cooperation with Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., and Texas Highway Dept., Austin.
Arlington, TX USA 76011
Washington, DC USA 20590
Texas State Department of Highways & Public TranspP.O. Box 5051
Austin, TX USA 78763
- Ross, HEJ
- Publication Date: 1974-4
- Pagination: 129 p.
- TRT Terms: Accuracy; Barriers (Roads); Collisions; Concrete; Design; Freeways; Guardrails; Highway planning; Highways; Impact tests; Median barriers; Metals; Performance; Safety engineering; Simulation; Testing; Traffic safety
- Uncontrolled Terms: Barriers; Design criteria
- Geographic Terms: Texas
- Subject Areas: Design; Highways; Research; Safety and Human Factors;
- Accession Number: 00091353
- Record Type: Publication
- Source Agency: National Technical Information Service
- Report/Paper Numbers: TTI-2-10-69-140-8 Res. Rept.
- Files: NTIS, TRIS, USDOT, STATEDOT
- Created Date: Jul 15 1975 12:00AM