For an individual to rationally oppose airport development at a particular site, the cost of opposition must be less than the expected payoff of that opposition. Of the many possible means of reducing opposition, four appear particularly promising: redistribution of airport benefits, congestion pricing, compatible land use control, and noise abatement operating procedures and technology. A program is recommended to test the accuracy of the public's perception of new airport development.

  • Corporate Authors:

    Urban Systems Research & Engineering, Incorporated

    1033 Massachusetts Avenue
    Cambridge, MA  United States  02138

    Esso International Services Incorporated

    Office of Aviation Policy and Plans
    New York, NY  United States 
  • Publication Date: 1973-6

Media Info

  • Pagination: 19 p.

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00080456
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Source Agency: National Technical Information Service
  • Report/Paper Numbers: Final Rpt.
  • Contract Numbers: DOT-FA72WA-3142
  • Files: NTIS
  • Created Date: Feb 27 1975 12:00AM