Volume III: High-Volume Recycled Materials for Sustainable Pavement Construction

Concrete production uses a considerable amount of non-renewable natural resources and generates a significant amount of greenhouse gases. To obtain a more sustainable solution requires examining the two main components of concrete – aggregates and cement. Recycling concrete as aggregate for new concrete reduces construction waste, diverts material from already over-burdened landfills, and lowers demand for virgin aggregate. Using supplementary cementitious materials – such as fly ash, blast furnace slag, and glass powder – also diverts material from landfills and reduces the carbon footprint of concrete. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) estimates that two billion tons of new aggregate are produced each year in the U.S. Aggregate demand is anticipated to increase to two and a half billion tons per year by 2020. With such a high demand for new aggregates, concern arises about the depletion of current sources of natural aggregates and the availability of new sources. Similarly, construction waste produced in the U.S. is expected to continue increasing. From building demolition alone, the annual production of construction waste is estimated to be 123 million tons, with concrete accounting for up to two-thirds of the total weight. Currently, this waste is most commonly disposed of in landfills. To address both the increasing demand for new aggregates and the increasing production of waste, many states have begun to recognize that more sustainable solutions exist in recycling waste concrete for use as aggregate in new concrete – recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). RCA helps address the question of how to sustain modern construction demands for aggregates and reduce the amount of waste entering already overburdened landfills. Many states have begun to implement RCA in new construction. For instance, 41 states have recognized the many uses of RCA as a raw material for riprap, soil stabilization, pipe bedding, and even landscape materials. Of these, 38 states have gone a step further in taking the additional step of integrating RCA into roadway systems for use as aggregate base course material. However, only 11 states have begun using RCA in portland cement concrete for pavement construction. The production of portland cement – the active ingredient in concrete – generates a significant amount of greenhouse gas emissions. Cement production accounts for approximately 4.5% of global CO₂ emissions from industry. According to the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, CO₂ emissions from cement manufacturing vary across worldwide regions from 0.73 to 0.99 lb of CO₂ for each lb of cement produced, and cement production is expected to reach four billion tons by the year 2020. One method of reducing the carbon footprint of concrete is to incorporate high volumes of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, blast furnace slag, and glass powder, which are also waste products. However, most current specifications significantly limit the percentages of SCMs in concrete. Combining RCA with SCMs will lower the carbon footprint of concrete, reduce waste entering landfills, preserve virgin material sources, and, if done correctly, reduce the overall cost. However, research is needed to determine the appropriate guidelines for incorporating these high volumes of recycled materials without compromising performance and service life.

• Record URL:
  https://recast.mst.edu/media/research/recast/documents/finalreports/2A-VolumeIII.pdf#200124112633
• Record URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54572
• Supplemental Notes:
  • This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program.
• Corporate Authors:

  University of Oklahoma, Norman

  Norman, OK  United States  73019

  Research on Concrete Applications for Sustainable Transportation (RE-CAST)

  Missouri University of Science and Technology
  Rolla, MO  United States  65409-0710

  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology

  University Transportation Centers Program
  Department of Transportation
  Washington, DC  United States  20590
• Authors:
  • Volz, Jeffery S
  • Hartell, Julie Ann
  • Allen, Lexis
  • Drury, Jonathan
  • McLauchlin, Rex
  • Banadkoki, Mohammad Zare
• Publication Date: 2020-1

Language

• English

Media Info

• Media Type: Digital/other
• Edition: Final Report
• Features: Figures; Photos; References; Tables;
• Pagination: 129p

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Fly ash; Greenhouse gases; Rigid pavements; Slag; Sustainable development
• Candidate Terms: Recycled concrete
• Subject Areas: Highways; Materials; Pavements;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 01730813
• Record Type: Publication
• Report/Paper Numbers: RECAST UTC # 00042134-05-2A
• Contract Numbers: DTRT13-G-UTC45
• Files: UTC, NTL, TRIS, ATRI, USDOT
• Created Date: Feb 11 2020 4:47PM