An Evaluation of Mass-normalization Using 50th and 95th Percentile Human Body Finite Element Models in Frontal Crash

Human body finite element models (FEMs) are ideal tools to explore the effects of body habitus on the biomechanical response of a given subject in a vehicle crash. This study aims to investigate the differences between a large male (M95) FEM and an average male (M50). The models are identical aside from their respective morphologies. The same generic frontal crash driver-side buck was used with each model with an acceleration pulse from a late model New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) crash. The HIC₁₅ of the M50 and M95 models were 491 and 806. The Brain Injury Criteria values for the M50 and M95 models were 0.50 and 0.64, respectively. Neck Injury Criteria for the M50 and M95 models were 0.44 and 0.41, respectively. The percent chest deflections were 21.1% for M50 and 17.3% for M95. Equal stress, equal velocity scaling was used to scale M95 outputs to the M50. Mass scaling was found to increase correlation of signal phases, but had diminished effect on magnitude and shape. Given the global trend of increased size of occupants, this study provides insight into the effects of body habitus on the occupant kinematics and injury risk in frontal crash.

  • Record URL:
  • Availability:
  • Supplemental Notes:
    • Abstract reprinted with permission of the International Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI).
  • Corporate Authors:

    International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI)

    Winkelriedstrasse 27
    Zurich,   Switzerland  CH-8006
  • Authors:
    • Davis, Matthew L
    • Vavalle, Nicholas A
    • Gayzik, F Scott
  • Conference:
  • Publication Date: 2015


  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01579113
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Report/Paper Numbers: IRC-15-68
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Oct 1 2015 12:04PM