Kinematic Rotational Brain Injury Criterion (BRIC)

Head rotation as a mechanism for brain injury was proposed back in the 1940s. Since then a multitude of research studies by various institutions were conducted to confirm/reject this hypothesis. Most of the studies were conducted on animals and concluded that rotational acceleration sustained by the animal’s head may cause axonal deformations large enough to induce their functional disruption. Other studies utilized mathematical models of human and animal heads to derive brain injury criteria based on deformation/pressure histories computed from the models. This study differs from the previous research in the following ways: first, it uses a detailed mathematical model of human head validated against various human brain response datasets; then establishes physical (strain and stress based) injury criteria for various types of brain injury based on scaled animal injury data; and finally, uses dummy (Hybrid III, ES-2re, WorldSID; all 50th percentile male) test data to establish kinematically (rotational accelerations and velocities) based brain injury criterion (BRIC) for each dummy. Similar procedures were applied to the college football data where thousands of head impacts were recorded using a six degrees of freedom (6 DOF) instrumented helmet system. Since animal injury data used in derivation of BRIC were predominantly for diffuse axonal injury (DAI) which is an AIS 4+ injury, cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) was used to derive BRIC risk curve for AIS 4+ brain injuries. The AIS 1+, 2+, 3+, and 5+ risk curves for CSDM were then computed using the ratios between corresponding risk curves for head injury criterion (HIC) at a 50% risk. The risk curves for BRIC were then obtained by setting its value to 1 such that it corresponds to 30% probability of DAI (AIS4+). The newly developed brain injury criterion is a complement to the existing HIC which is based on translational accelerations. Together, the two criteria may be able to capture most brain injuries and skull fractures occurring in automotive or any other impact environment. One of the main limitations for any brain injury criteria, including BRIC, is the lack of human injury data to validate the criteria against, although some approximation for AIS 2+ injury is given based on the estimate of average injurious (concussion) angular velocities and accelerations for the college football players instrumented with 5 DOF helmet system. Despite the limitations, a new kinematic rotational brain injury criterion – BRIC – may offer additional protection to an automotive occupant in situations when using translational accelerations based HIC alone may not be sufficient.

• Record URL:
  http://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/22/isv7/main.htm
• Corporate Authors:

  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

  1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
  Washington, DC  United States  20590
• Authors:
  • Takhounts, Erik G
  • Hasija, Vikas
  • Ridella, Stephen A
  • Rowson, Steve
  • Duma, Stefan M
• Conference:
  • 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
  • Location: Washington DC
  • Date: 2011-6-13 to 2011-6-16
• Publication Date: 2011

Language

• English

Media Info

• Media Type: Digital/other
• Features: Figures; References; Tables;
• Pagination: 10p
• Monograph Title: 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Brain; Crash injury research; Crash victim simulation; Dummies; Injury classification; Kinematics; Mathematical models; Skull fractures; Traumatic brain injuries
• Identifier Terms: Head Injury Criterion
• Subject Areas: Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I84: Personal Injuries;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 01570193
• Record Type: Publication
• Report/Paper Numbers: 11-0263
• Files: TRIS, ATRI, USDOT
• Created Date: Jul 20 2015 3:48PM