SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE SETTLEMENT OF CONTRACT CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE

IN MOST RESEARCH HERETOFORE DEVOTED TO THE CHANGING ROLE OF THE DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, ONLY SLIGHT ATTENTION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO CLAIMS ARISING FROM CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS INVOLVING PUBLIC AGENCIES. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTED CONTRACT CLAIMS CALL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURES THROUGH NEW LEGISLATION ON EXISTING DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY. VARIOUS TYPES OF STATE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT MACHINERY REVIEWED INCLUDE' JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER CONSENT TO SUE LAWS, ADMINISTRATIVE BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS, ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS OF CLAIMS, CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS OF CLAIMS, LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATIONS, AND MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURES. STATES PROCEDURES ARE ALSO COMPARED WITH FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES. /AUTHOR/

Media Info

  • Media Type: Print
  • Features: Appendices;
  • Pagination: pp 27-51
  • Monograph Title: Frontiers of research in highway law 1963-1964
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00238275
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS, TRB
  • Created Date: Dec 12 1994 12:00AM