Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of a Suicide Barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge

The Golden Gate Bridge (GGB) is a well-known “suicide magnet” and the site of approximately 30 suicides per year. Recently, a suicide barrier was approved to prevent further suicides. With nonphysical interventions (such as safety patrols and suicide prevention training) proven to be only moderately effective, a physical barrier remains the only preventive system that will completely stop GGB suicides. This study was undertaken to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the proposed suicide barrier. The authors compared the proposed costs of the barrier over a 20-year period ($51.6 million) to estimated reductions in mortality. They reviewed San Francisco and Golden Gate Bridge suicides over a 70-year period (1936–2006), assuming that all suicides prevented by the barrier would attempt suicide with alternative methods. They also estimated the mortality reduction based on the difference in lethality between GGB jumps and other suicide methods. Cost/benefit analyses utilized estimates of value of statistical life (VSL) used in highway projects. GGB suicides occur at a rate of approximately 30 per year, with a lethality of 98%. Jumping from other structures has an average lethality of 47%. Assuming that unsuccessful suicides eventually committed suicide at previously reported (12–13%) rates, approximately 286 lives would be saved over a 20-year period at an average cost/life of approximately $180,419 i.e., roughly 6% of US Department of Transportation minimal VSL estimate ($3.2 million). Cost-benefit analysis suggests that a suicide barrier on the GGB would result in a highly cost-effective reduction in suicide mortality in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Language

  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01529206
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Jul 31 2013 1:48PM