Federal-Aid Highways: Improved Guidance Could Enhance States’ Use of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Selection

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) provides state transportation agencies with a tool to evaluate and select the most cost-effective type of pavement, one of the major cost components of many highway projects. Given the high demand for federal highway funding, the federal government has an acute interest in helping states use LCCA to make cost-effective decisions when investing federal-aid highway funds. Accordingly, it is important that FHWA’s guidance on LCCA aligns with best practices. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act directed the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review LCCA best practices. GAO (1) described how state transportation agencies conduct and use LCCA and (2) assessed the extent to which FHWA’s LCCA guidance conforms to the GAO Cost Guide’s cost-estimating best practices. Thirteen of the 16 state transportation agencies GAO contacted used LCCA to select the pavement type (e.g., asphalt or concrete) for certain road construction and rehabilitation projects. Officials in all 13 states indicated that LCCA helped ensure that the agency selected the pavement that was most cost-effective over the long term, but states’ specific LCCA practices varied. In general, these states used LCCA for larger projects, but each state had unique criteria to determine which projects should be subject to an LCCA. Likewise, the broad categories of LCCA inputs—such as agency costs, timing of future road work, and discount rate—are similar, but state transportation agencies handled each of these inputs in different ways. For example, estimates of when future roadwork would occur for a particular pavement type were based on state-specific factors, such as past experience with pavements and climate. Furthermore, state agencies used different criteria to decide if LCCA results clearly indicated a pavement type with the lowest life-cycle cost. In 9 of the 13 states that used LCCA, the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) LCCA guidance was an important influence on state practices, according to state transportation officials, and 7 states used LCCA software developed by FHWA. FHWA’s LCCA guidance largely aligns with the GAO Cost Guide’s best practices for two of the four phases of the cost-estimating process and partially aligns with two other phases. FHWA’s guidance in the Initiation phase, which includes initial planning steps, aligns with best practices overall. Agency guidance covers about half of the best practices of the Assessment phase, but does not, for example, discuss the use of independent cost estimates for comparison and cross checks, an important quality step to ensure the estimate’s credibility. In the Analysis phase, FHWA’s guidance does a good job explaining how to address the variability inherent in cost estimation, but could better address how LCCA should be documented for subsequent review. Lastly, in the Presentation phase, FHWA’s guidance does not include sufficient information on how to present LCCA results to management for decision-making and on when an LCCA should be updated. By better incorporating best practices in the guidance, FHWA could help states produce credible and accurate cost estimates and make more cost-effective federal-aid highway fund investment decisions. To better ensure federal-aid highway funds are invested effectively, FHWA should update LCCA guidance to fully incorporate the Cost Guide’s best practices.


  • English

Media Info

  • Media Type: Digital/other
  • Features: Appendices; Figures; Tables;
  • Pagination: 34p

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01484264
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Report/Paper Numbers: GAO-13-544
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Jun 19 2013 8:33AM