Life Cycle Comparison of Steel and GFRP Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Designs in the Context of Uncertainty

Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.

  • Corporate Authors:

    Federal Highway Administration

    1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
    Washington, DC  United States  20590

    National Concrete Bridge Council

    Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road
    Skokie, IL  United States  60077-1083

    Missouri Department of Transportation

    105 West Capitol Avenue
    Jefferson City, MO  United States  65102

    American Concrete Institute (ACI)

    38800 Country Club Drive
    Farmington Hills, MI  United States  48331
  • Authors:
    • Christensen, Paul N
    • Sparks, Gordon A
    • Tadros, Gamil
    • Lau, Mike
    • Eden, Ruth J
  • Conference:
  • Publication Date: 2008

Language

  • English

Media Info

  • Media Type: CD-ROM
  • Features: Figures; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: 11p
  • Monograph Title: HPC: Safe, Affordable, and Efficient

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01104994
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS, USDOT, STATEDOT
  • Created Date: Jul 24 2008 9:28AM