Mass Transit Sustainability in the Saint Louis Region

It has been often suggested that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome. Unfortunately a dispassionate evaluation of the current state of public transit in the United States would easily fit this definition. Public transportation funding continues to require federal, state, and local tax reserves in an attempt to address the needs and adapt to the trends of growing urban communities and support sustainable mass transit solutions. Fifty years of increased funding for domestic mass transit infrastructure and services has been met with overall ridership decline (as a percentage of urban population). Caught between looming deficits and a failure to attract consumers is a mangled web of inefficient operations, financially unsustainable funding commitments, and an inability to adequately modernize transit systems. Despite good intentions, investments are now contributing to an unsustainable trend. Successful and scalable examples of ways to improve sustainability are already in place around the globe and are promoting an era of shared responsibility for mass transit between public and private sectors. Latin America, being the earliest adopter of modern and sustainable mass transit systems, operations, and infrastructure, has seen great economic and consumer success. Now other regions— China, India, South Africa, North America, and Eastern Europe—are committing to innovative and rewarding approaches to leveraging and restructuring mass transit systems. Although still a work in progress for some cities, the partnering between government infrastructure and private investors supports a future of flexibility, accountability, and profitability for mass transit in areas with growing urban populations and is a viable solution for the transportation challenges and environmental concerns associated with large populations. This report explores alternatives implemented in various countries and the factors that contributed to their successes and failures. Most successes tend to result from the collaboration itself and lead to each sector’s common triumph: government stability through a reduced dependency on public subsidies and increased private innovation. These innovative solutions for improving mass transit are sustainable and scalable and require no additional government funding or subsidies. They may be the only viable options available for creating sustainable mass transit systems.

• Record URL:
  http://www.intrans.iastate.edu/research/documents/research-reports/st_louis_mass_tranist_sustainability_w_cvr.pdf
• 
• Record URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/29608
• Supplemental Notes:
  • This document was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program. Alternate title: Mass Transit Sustainability in the St. Louis Region.
• Corporate Authors:

  University of Missouri, St. Louis

  Center for Transportation Studies
  154 University Center, One University Boulevard
  St. Louis, MO  United States  63121

  Midwest Transportation Center

  2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4700
  Ames, IA  United States  50010-8664

  Iowa State University, Ames

  Institute for Transportation Studies
  2711 S. Loop Drive, Suite 4700, Program for Sustainable Pavement Engineering and Research (PROSPER)
  Ames, IA  United States  50010-8864

  Department of Transportation

  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology
  1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
  Washington, DC  United States  20590

  Research and Innovative Technology Administration

  1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
  Washington, DC  United States  20590
• Authors:
  • Mundy, Ray A
  • Rust, Daniel L
  • Phillips, Sareema Koirala
  • Nasser, Sidra
  • Páez, María Gabriela Rodríguez
  • Snowden, Elizabeth
• Publication Date: 2015-10

Language

• English

Media Info

• Media Type: Digital/other
• Edition: Final Report
• Features: Figures; References; Tables;
• Pagination: 65p

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Alternatives analysis; Case studies; Countries; Financial analysis; Public private partnerships; Public transit; Ridership; Sustainable development
• Identifier Terms: Bi-State Development Agency; Regional Transportation Authority (Illinois)
• Geographic Terms: Saint Louis (Missouri)
• Subject Areas: Economics; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I10: Economics and Administration; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 01580884
• Record Type: Publication
• Contract Numbers: DTRT13-G-UTC37
• Files: UTC, NTL, TRIS, RITA, ATRI, USDOT
• Created Date: Nov 20 2015 5:11PM