Pile/Shaft Designs Using Artificial Neural Networks (i.e., Genetic Programming) with Spatial Variability Considerations
This work focused on the improvement of FB-DEEP’s prediction of skin and tip resistance of concrete piles and drilled shafts in Florida. For the work, data from 19 concrete pile sites and 18 drilled shaft sites were collected. This included 458 standard penetration test (SPT) borings on the pile sites and 815 borings on the drilled shaft sites. A total of 64 static pile load tests and 66 drilled shaft tests were acquired. For the piles, 48 tests reached Davisson Capacity, of which 28 had separation of skin and tip resistance. All of the drilled shafts were instrumented with strain gauges from which unit skin transfer (T–Z) was assessed for Florida limestone. All of the data were uploaded into the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) online database based on position (i.e., station + offset, or global positioning system (GPS)). In the case of piles, the data (e.g., boring vs. measured skin friction) were analyzed with a genetic program (GP) algorithm to construct equations for unit skin friction and tip resistance based on soil type (Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)) and SPT N values. The resulting GP skin friction curves were found to be similar to FB-DEEP; the tip resistance curves had higher unit tip resistance vs. blow count values, as well as being only averaged 4 diameters/widths beneath the piles. In addition, the practice of setting SPT N to zero for N< 5 was found to be conservative, and the use of N=5 for N< 5 is recommended. For both current FB-DEEP and GP curves, load resistance factor design, LRFD Φ, were obtained for borings within 100 ft. In the case of borings outside this distance or for site-specific conditions, method error (CVm) for FB-DEEP and the GP curves is presented from which LRFD Φ may be found. In the case of drilled shaft, the GP algorithm a developed normalized unit skin friction vs. displacement curve for limestone, which were similar to Kim (2001). In the case of ultimate skin friction in limestone, the GP algorithm was used to validate the FDOT relationship between unit skin friction and rock strength (unconfined compression, split tension).
- Record URL:
- Summary URL:
-
Supplemental Notes:
- Cover date: February 2014.
-
Corporate Authors:
University of Florida, Gainesville
Department of Civil and Costal Engineering
365 Weil Hall, P.O. Box 116580
Gainesville, FL United States 32611Florida Department of Transportation
605 Suwannee Street
Tallahassee, FL United States 32399-0450Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC United States 20590 -
Authors:
- McVay, Michael C
- Klammler, Harald
- Tran, Khiem
- Faraone, Michael
- Dodge, Nathan
- Vera, Nilses
- Yuan, Le
- Publication Date: 2014-3
Language
- English
Media Info
- Media Type: Digital/other
- Edition: Final Report
- Features: Figures; References; Tables;
- Pagination: 133p
Subject/Index Terms
- TRT Terms: Genetic algorithms; Limestone; Load and resistance factor design; Skin friction; Soil penetration test; Strain gages; Support piles
- Identifier Terms: FB-DEEP (Software)
- Geographic Terms: Florida
- Subject Areas: Bridges and other structures; Design; Highways; I24: Design of Bridges and Retaining Walls;
Filing Info
- Accession Number: 01522221
- Record Type: Publication
- Contract Numbers: BDK75-977-68; 00100800
- Files: TRIS, ATRI, USDOT, STATEDOT
- Created Date: Apr 22 2014 3:04PM