THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE DISTRACTION ON DRIVER VISUAL BEHAVIOUR AND VEHICLE CONTROL

Driver distraction and inattention are important driving safety issues. As the use of in-vehicle technologies becomes more popular, there is concern about a concomitant increase in driver distraction arising from their use. The introduction of hands-free devices is intended to reduce distraction due to manual operation of these units. However, a major part of the distraction associated with their use may arise from the cognitive consequences of their use, and not from the manual manipulation of the devices. In the present study, the impact of cognitive distraction on drivers' behavior was investigated in an on-road experiment. Twenty-one drivers' drove an 8 km city route while carrying out tasks varying in cognitive complexity. Each driver drove the route under three task conditions: while performing difficult addition problems (e.g., 47+38), while performing easy addition problems (e.g. 6+9), and with no additional task. The addition questions and the participants' responses were communicated via a fully hands-free cell phone so that the participants did not have to look away from the road to manually operate the phone. Visual scanning patterns were recorded using eye tracking equipment, measures of vehicle control (braking/longitudinal deceleration) were obtained using the MicroDAS system, and drivers' subjective evaluations of workload (NASA TLX), safety and distraction were obtained through questionnaires. An examination of drivers' visual behavior revealed that, under conditions of increased cognitive load, they made fewer saccades, spent more time looking centrally and spent less time looking to the right periphery. Less time was spent checking instruments and the rear view mirror. Many drivers changed their inspection patterns of the forward view when performing the most demanding tasks. Marked individual differences were observed in these patterns of change. Performing the additional tasks while driving resulted in more incidents of hard braking while driving. The increase in cognitive load induced by the addition questions was reflected in drivers' increased ratings of workload and distraction as well as reduced ratings of driving safety. The results of this study indicate that even when in-vehicle devices are hands-free, significant changes in driver behavior may result due to the cognitive distraction associated with their use. The study recommends public education, as well as continuing research to determine the need for regulating original equipment.

• Record URL:
  http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20060212011308/http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/tp/tp13889/pdf/tp13889es.pdf
• Summary URL:
  http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20060212011308/www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/tp/tp13889/en/menu.htm
• Corporate Authors:

  Transport Canada

  330 Sparks Street, Tower C, 8th Floor
  Ottawa, Ontario  Canada  K1A 0N5
• Authors:
  • Harbluk, J L
  • Noy, Y I
  • Eizenman, M
• Publication Date: 2002-2

Language

• English

Media Info

• Features: Figures; References; Tables;
• Pagination: 29 p.

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Attention; Behavior; Cellular telephones; Cognition; Control; Distraction; Drivers; Driving; Eye fixations; Eye movements; Human factors; Human subject testing; Instrument panels; Mathematics; Motor vehicle operations; Motor vehicles; Rearview mirrors; Traffic safety
• Uncontrolled Terms: Hard braking; Saccades
• Subject Areas: Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 00942271
• Record Type: Publication
• Report/Paper Numbers: TP# 13889 E
• Files: TRIS
• Created Date: May 5 2003 12:00AM