KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPING LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

This report is intended to be a reference to clarify the decision making process that leads to selection of (a) an approach for a transportation system management (TSM) program (voluntary or regulatory), (b) whom to include in the program, (c) program goals, (d) mitigation measure requirements, and (e) an administrative structure for the program. TSM programs can be a cost-effective way to increase vehicle occupancy and thus improve efficiency of the street and highway systems. However, in most cases, TSM programs alone will not solve the traffic problems, so they should be considered just one part of a broader strategy. A city should develop its TSM program through a consensus between the public and private sectors. Employers prefer voluntary programs, but they tolerate mandatory programs that are inexpensive, allow flexibility in meeting requirements, and allow private-sector control. The combined voluntary/mandatory TSM approach, a program type that starts as voluntary and becomes mandatory only if and when preselected targets are not reached, appears especially promising. The programs that are most effective at increasing the commute-alternatives-use rate are characterized by a long-term funding source that can maintain sufficient professional staff time for fairly intensive work with targeted employers and developers. Various factors, including the transportation environment, employer characteristics, employee characteristics, and the development environment, should be assessed in developing the TSM program. A program's goal should not be too high; credibility will be enhanced by selecting an ambitious but achievable goal. According to a 1985 Metropolitan Transportation Commission study, a good employer program can result in 5 to 8 percent of employees switching to nonsolo driving. Much higher changes have been achieved, but rarely. Compliance is usually judged based on implementing program requirements rather than meeting specific numerical goals. Implementation of a program's requirements by no means guarantees that the goal will be met.

• Record URL:
  http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1989/1212/1212-003.pdf
• Record URL:
  https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=KEY+CONSIDERATIONS+FOR+DEVELOPING+LOCAL+GOVERNMENT+TRANSPORTATION+SYSTEM+MANAGEMENT+PROGRAMS&author=S.+Pultz&publication_year=1989
• Availability:
  • Find a library where document is available. Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309048109
• Supplemental Notes:
  • This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1212, Ridesharing--Transportation Demand Management. Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved
• Authors:
  • Pultz, Susan
• Publication Date: 1989

Media Info

• Features: References; Tables;
• Pagination: p. 24-33
• Monograph Title: Ridesharing: transportation demand management
• Serial:
  • Transportation Research Record
  • Issue Number: 1212
  • Publisher: Transportation Research Board
  • ISSN: 0361-1981

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Administration; Cooperation; Decision making; Development; Finance; Financing; Governments; Local government; Measures of effectiveness; Private enterprise; Strategic planning; Time duration; Traffic mitigation; Transportation system management; Vehicle occupancy
• Uncontrolled Terms: Effectiveness; Increase; Long term; Programs
• Subject Areas: Administration and Management; Finance; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 00492039
• Record Type: Publication
• ISBN: 0309048109
• Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
• Created Date: Mar 31 1990 12:00AM