COMPARISON OF METHODS AND EQUIPMENT TO CONDUCT PAVEMENT DISTRESS SURVEYS

Selected distress survey methods and equipment, representing a range in automation, were tested and evaluated. The following methods and devices were included in the testing: manual mapping; detailed visual surveys using manual recording and automatic data logging; and the PASCO ROADRECON, Groupe Examen Routier Photographic (GERPHO), Automatic Road Analyzer (ARAN), and Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) high-speed survey vehicles. Field tests were conducted on flexible, rigid, and composite pavements exhibiting a range of pavement distresses. The distress survey methods and equipment were evaluated based on their performance and capabilities in the field. The study concludes that, at present, the GERPHO and PASCO ROADRECON can be used for both network level and project level distress surveys and are well suited for pavement research studies. The ARAN and Laser RST are recommended for consideration in network-level surveys. It is also recommended that automatic data loggers be used when manual distress surveys are conducted.

Media Info

  • Features: Figures; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: p. 40-50
  • Monograph Title: Pavement evaluation and rehabilitation
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00490145
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0309047714
  • Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
  • Created Date: Dec 31 1989 12:00AM