CONTAINER COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES OF TWO ATLANTIC PORTS

With large new-generation container ships "load centering" at fewer ports, competition between ports for container traffic is expected to reach fever pitch. The level of business required to justify massive investments in modern port facilities will be attained only if efficient port and inland transport services at competitive rates are aggressively produced and marketed. The contrasting strategies of the ports of Halifax and New York and New Jersey (NY-NJ) for attracting containerized cargo are reviewed in light of their respective markets, transport characteristics, regulatory constraints, and competitive postures. Although both ports are investing heavily in new facilities and pressing for modified labor rules, NY-NJ has pursued and reached agreement with railroads on double-stack container services. Halifax, on the other hand, is giving priority to establishing alternative rail services on the Montreal route to create effective competition with Canadian National Railways (CN Rail). Although CN Rail has experimented with double-stack container cars, no innovative inland transportation arrangements have been consummated. Without greater efficiency in overland movements to and from Halifax, Montreal will probably continue to significantly constrain Halifax's competitive position until large container ships that cannot reach Montreal begin to dominate the trade, which will further stiffen competition from NY-NJ.

Media Info

  • Media Type: Print
  • Features: Figures; Maps; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: pp 1-6
  • Monograph Title: Freight transportation
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00474181
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0309040558
  • Files: TRIS, TRB
  • Created Date: Oct 31 1988 12:00AM