Pedestrian Safety and Traffic Operations Near Transit Stops

This research project’s objective was to investigate the impacts of transit stop location (near-side versus far-side) on pedestrian safety and traffic operations at intersections. Three different video-based behavioral observation data collections at signals in Utah were utilized and studied: (1) transit stop events (interactions between transit vehicles and other vehicles) and transit rider crossing behaviors and vehicle conflicts; (2) pedestrian conflicts with right-turning vehicles (conflict severity, driver/pedestrian reactions); and (3) pedestrian crossing behaviors (crossing location, crossing behaviors). These outcomes were then statistically compared for near-side versus far-side transit stop locations. From the results, far-side transit stops are better for general traffic operations. Although transit departure delays are more likely and impactful at far-side stops, actions can be taken to improve transit operations there. On the other hand, the evidence pointed toward far-side transit stops being worse for pedestrian safety. Specifically, conflicts at far-side stops were more severe, and drivers were less likely to slow/stop for pedestrians. This finding corroborates prior Utah-based research results that there were more pedestrian crashes at intersections with more far-side transit stops. Reconciling these differing findings likely requires improving pedestrian safety at some far-side transit stops, and prioritizing safety over operational efficiency at other near-side transit stops.

Language

  • English

Media Info

  • Media Type: Digital/other
  • Edition: Final Report
  • Features: Figures; Maps; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: 41p

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01940370
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Report/Paper Numbers: MPC-693, MPC 24-550
  • Files: UTC, NTL, TRIS, USDOT
  • Created Date: Dec 19 2024 2:14PM