METHODOLOGY FOR COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION AND TSM ALTERNATIVES

In order to assess the difference in economic effects between construction projects and non-construction TSM investments, an economic analysis was conducted using the traditional "benefit-cost" (B/C) method. The TSM investments consist of costs required to fund a staggered work hours (SWH) program, increasing the vehicle occupancy rate (VOR), and increasing the transit mode split. This method determines the ratio of benefits to cost after each project/alternative has been discounted with respect to its expected life at a minimal attractive rate of return (i.e., all projects/alternatives were discounted to an equivalent uniform annual cost based on an expected life of 20 years and a minimal attractive rate of return of 10%). Projects with B/C ratios greater than one ( > 1.0) are considered economically attractive while those with B/C ratios less than one ( < 1.0) are considered not to be economically efficient.

  • Availability:
  • Corporate Authors:

    Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)

    Washington, DC  United States 
  • Authors:
    • Legett, E D
  • Publication Date: 1984-8

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00393547
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Source Agency: Engineering Index
  • Report/Paper Numbers: HS-037 712
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: May 31 1985 12:00AM