PEER COMPARISONS IN TRANSIT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

A methodlogy by which to group urbanized areas for the purpose of peer comparisons in transit performance evaluation is presented. A suitable basis for grouping was found to be those market and environmental variables that effectively constrain attainable performance levels. By using U.S. Bureau of the Census data for 1980, homogenous clusters of urbanized areas were formed and the key market and environmental variables were reduced by means of of factor analysis to one size index. Reporting-system data as outlined in Section 15 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 were used both to evaluate adequacy of the grouping scheme and to establish attainable target performance levels. General relationships were observed between the mean transit performance of the peer groups and their mean size indices. It was concluded that regression models were the most effective way to eliminate the effects of market and environmental dissimilarities in establishing target performance levels. Models relating individual performance measures to significant market and environmental variables were calibrated for each peer group.

Media Info

  • Media Type: Print
  • Features: References; Tables;
  • Pagination: pp 13-21
  • Monograph Title: Transit performance evaluation and auditing
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00391930
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0309037174
  • Files: TRIS, TRB
  • Created Date: Jan 30 1985 12:00AM