PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF AASHTO GIRDERS WITH NEW OPTIMIZED SECTIONS

Structural efficiency and cost-effectiveness of bridges built with pretensioned I-sections and T-sections and a cast-in-place deck were evaluated. Selected precast, prestressed sections produced in the United States were compared with AASHTO and Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) girders. Spans in excess of 80-ft. (24.4 m) were considered. Bulb-T, Colorado, and Washington girders were more structurally efficient than AASHTO-PCI girders. Cost analyses were performed on existing Bulb-T, Colorado, Washington, and AASHTO girders, and on modified counterparts with 6-in.-thick (152-mm) webs. Bulb-T's were found to be the most cost-effective girder, with estimated cost savings of 17 percent on the in-place cost of girders and deck compared with the AASHTO girders. For equal span length, girder spacing, and truck loading, modified Bulb-T's required up to 25 percent less prestressing force than the AAHSTO girders. Modified Bulb-T's are recommended for use as national standards. Ways of implementing the proposed new optimized sections are suggested. (Author)

Media Info

  • Media Type: Print
  • Features: Figures; References;
  • Pagination: pp 85-92
  • Monograph Title: Second bridge engineering conference. volumes 1 and 2
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00390817
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 03090036593
  • Files: TRIS, TRB
  • Created Date: Dec 30 1984 12:00AM