Evaluation of the efficacy of an intersection conflict warning system at two-way stop-controlled rural intersections: Difference-in-differences and triple-difference analytical approaches

This article reports on a study that investigated the impact of the use of intersection conflict warning systems (ICWSs) on the incident of crashes at high-risk, two-way stop-controlled intersections in Minnesota (from 2010-2018). The authors analyzed the potential causal relations between ICWSs and various crash rate outcomes, including total number of crashes, injury, non-injury, targeted right-angle and non-right-angle crashes. The study compared data for intersections with (n = 56) and without ICWSs (n = 168), including as many comparable intersection characteristics as possible. The study showed that ICWS treatment was significantly associated with a decreasing trend for targeted right-angle crash rates. The authors discuss a number of trends in their data that did not reach statistical significance. They conclude with a discussion of potential causal associations between intersection safety countermeasures and crashes at high-risk rural two-way stop-controlled intersections.

Language

  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01918553
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: May 15 2024 3:27PM