Users and non-users of bikesharing: how do they differ?
What makes some people eschew bikesharing? What distinguishes users from non-users? The present study examines the transport priorities and socio-demographic characteristics of both users and non-users of bikesharing in the context of Adelaide, an Australian metropolis of 1.3 million people. The authors apply statistical techniques, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and two-level Nested Logit (NL) modelling, to original survey data collected in 2018. The authors find that younger age, digital literacy, full-time work status, household size, and certain transport priority dimensions which they term Safekeeping, Ease, and Fitness, are key factors associated with the likelihood of choosing or shunning bikesharing as a mode of transport.
- Record URL:
-
Availability:
- Find a library where document is available. Order URL: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1767712
-
Supplemental Notes:
- © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Abstract reprinted with permission of Taylor & Francis.
-
Authors:
- Soltani, Ali
- Allan, Andrew
- Pojani, Dorina
- Khalaj, Fahimeh
- Mehdizadeh, Milad
- Publication Date: 2022-1
Language
- English
Media Info
- Media Type: Web
- Pagination: pp 39-58
-
Serial:
- Transportation Planning and Technology
- Volume: 45
- Issue Number: 1
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis
- ISSN: 0308-1060
- Serial URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gtpt20/current
Subject/Index Terms
- TRT Terms: Bicycling; Travel behavior; Vehicle sharing
- Geographic Terms: Adelaide (Australia)
- Subject Areas: Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists;
Filing Info
- Accession Number: 01838614
- Record Type: Publication
- Files: TRIS
- Created Date: Mar 15 2022 4:18PM