CASE FOR REMOVING BRIDGE OR CULVERT RAILS ON LOW-VOLUME RURAL ROADS

Concrete or masonry bridge rails, parapets, or hubguards (if more than 4 in. higher than the roadway surface) on a narrow bridges and culverts on low-volume (ADT less than 400) rural (LVR) roads are dangerous roadside obstacles. Based on the current state of knowledge it is suggested that, in many instances, striking the end of a rigid bridge-culvert rail is more hazardous to the motorist than traversing the adjacent stream bed or drainage area when rails have been removed. The case for rail removal is supported by the effective widening of the roadway due to rail removal, convenience to farmers in moving wide, low farm equipment, and benefit/cost ratios. The benefits are estimated reductions in annual accident costs and were calculated by using current published data on estimated collision frequencies, accident severity indices, and accident costs. The costs are the estimated costs of all rail removal. There is a need for roadside hazard research aimed specifically at the problem of quantifying the hazard of vehicles that strike bridge-culvert rails versus the hazard of vehicles running off the road after rail removal. (Author)

Media Info

  • Media Type: Print
  • Features: Figures; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: pp 50-53
  • Monograph Title: DESIGN AND UPGRADING OF SURFACING AND OTHER ASPECTS OF LOW-VOLUME ROADS
  • Serial:

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 00371742
  • Record Type: Publication
  • ISBN: 0309034620
  • Report/Paper Numbers: HS-035 177
  • Files: HSL, TRIS, TRB
  • Created Date: Apr 29 1983 12:00AM