1. Home
  2. TRID
  3. View Record
https://www.nationalacademies.org/trb/events

Detection Response Task Evaluation for Driver Distraction Measurement for Auditory-Vocal Tasks: Experiment 2

This research evaluated the Detection Response Task (DRT) as a measure of the attentional demands of auditory-vocal in-vehicle tasks. DRT is an ISO standardized method that requires participants to respond to simple targets that occur every 3-5 s during in-vehicle task performance. DRT variants use different targets: Remote DRT (RDRT) uses visual targets; Tactile DRT (TDRT) uses vibrating targets. A single experiment evaluated the sensitivity of the two DRT variants in two test venues (driving simulator and non-driving) using auditory-vocal tasks. Participant selection criteria from the Visual-Manual National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Driver Distraction Guidelines were used to recruit 192 participants; 48 were assigned to each combination of DRT variant and test venue. Identical production vehicles were used in each venue. In the simulator, participants wore a head-mounted eye tracker and performed in-vehicle tasks while driving in a car-following scenario. In the non-driving venue, occlusion testing required participants to perform the four discrete tasks while wearing occlusion goggles, which restricted viewing intermittently to simulate driving task demands. In-vehicle tasks for both venues included three discrete auditory-vocal tasks (destination entry, phone dialing, radio tuning), one discrete visual-manual task (radio tuning), and two continuous auditory-vocal digit-recall tasks representing acceptable (1-back) and unacceptable (2-back) levels of attentional load. Testing in each venue had a second part. All participants’ last procedural step involved brake response time (BRT) testing in the simulator which required participants to brake in response to both expected and unexpected lead-vehicle (LV) braking events while performing selected in-vehicle tasks. Differences observed between test venues suggest that some in-vehicle tasks are more demanding when performed intermittently in the driving simulator than when performed continuously in the non-driving venue, thus pointing to the driving simulator as the better test venue. BRT results provided some support for a connection between DRT RT and BRT; however, the experiment did not provide sufficient control of speed and headway to allow a stronger comparison. DRT results support the conclusion that the 2-back condition represents too much attentional demand and that acceptable tasks should have a lower level of attentional demand. Differences between total shutter open time (TSOT) and total eyes-off-road time (TEORT) indicated that occlusion is not suitable for assessing auditory-vocal tasks; however, TEORT and other glance-based metrics appear suitable for use with auditory-vocal tasks. BRT testing revealed a small effect of attentional load for unexpected LV braking events but not for expected LV braking events. Mean heart rate was sensitive to differences in attentional load.

Language

  • English

Media Info

  • Media Type: Digital/other
  • Edition: Final Report
  • Features: Appendices; Figures; Photos; References; Tables;
  • Pagination: 176p

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01730832
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Report/Paper Numbers: DOT HS 812 800
  • Files: HSL, NTL, TRIS, ATRI, USDOT
  • Created Date: Feb 12 2020 9:45AM