Error Types and Potential Mitigation Strategies in Signal Passed at Danger (SPAD) Events in an Australian Rail Organisation

A common safety issue in the rail industry is a Signal Passed at Danger (SPAD) occurrence in which a train encroaches into a section of track without authority, usually by passing a signal at stop. This study aimed to analyze SPADs using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) modified to suit the rail industry (HFACS-RR) to examine the human factors involved in the occurrences and identify trends. An analysis of an Australian freight rail organization’s investigation reports (N = 35) into SPADs was undertaken. The analysis revealed at least one HFACS-RR category for each of the events examined. It was found that 97.1% (n = 34) of the events had an ‘operator act’ category, with 74.3% associated with operator errors. Contraventions (e.g. violation of signal approach speed) and distraction (e.g. focus on other non-critical tasks) were the most common types of errors. Mitigation strategies to address these errors are discussed. These include a single methodology to investigate SPADs; train driver performance monitoring; and training strategies focused on route knowledge, all of which have the potential to reduce SPADs and thereby minimize risk and improve safety. Future research into SPADs may include utilizing a larger sample from various organizations and examining potential differences in the frequency and types of errors of single versus two-man crewed trains.

Language

  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01675848
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Jul 23 2018 2:13PM