Evolution of Cycle Track Designs in Kelowna (Presentation)

Lessons Learned 1. Street-level is more desirable for advanced cyclists as it offers faster & smoother riding & less conflicts with pedestrians 2. Raised is susceptible to pedestrian encroachments and intersection/driveway ups & downs resulting in reduced speed & comfort 3. Two-way on one side requires less land but is more challenging in terms of intersection layout & signal design to maintain safety 4. One-way on two sides requires more land but is less challenging in terms of intersection & signal design 5. Bike signals, boulevard trees, sightlines, waiting areas & wayfinding signs are often undervalued but are key to the success of cycle tracks 6. A $1,500 per m cycle track may achieve the same results as $4,000-$5,000 per m (with full road upgrades), if planned & designed carefully 7. Requirements for snow clearance, sweeping, driveway accesses, transit stops & on-street parking influence design significantly 8. A small connected network produces quicker results than numerous scattered links

Language

  • English

Media Info

  • Media Type: Web
  • Pagination: 1 PDF file, 4.1 MB, 27 slides.
  • Monograph Title: Kelowna 2016 - CITE Annual Meeting and Conference - Technical Compendium

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01616309
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Source Agency: Transportation Association of Canada (TAC)
  • Files: ITRD, TAC
  • Created Date: Nov 15 2016 4:49PM