A Summary of Design, Policies and Operational Characteristics for Shared Bicycle/Bus Lanes

This report contains the results of an investigation of the design and operation of shared bicycle/bus lanes in municipalities in the United States and other countries. These lanes are designated for use by public transit buses, bicycles, and usually also for right-turning vehicles. Some municipalities may also allow use of these lanes by taxis and delivery vehicles. The purpose of such lanes is to provide a time advantage to public transit service by taking the buses out of the general traffic flow and into a designated lane. Where constrained right-of-way prevents provision of a separate bicycle lane, the intent is to allow bicycles to use the designated bus lane. This is to provide a more direct route for bicyclists, provide greater level of service to bicyclists and provide some degree of space separation between general traffic and bicyclists for their greater safety and comfort. However, this combined use raises many issues of compatibility of bicycles and buses sharing the same road space. The limited available research on the subject of shared bicycle/bus lanes includes informative investigations from the Minneapolis Public Works Department, Minnesota; the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Pennsylvania; the City of Ottawa, Canada; the Department for Transport of the United Kingdom; and Austroads, Sydney, Australia. Investigators compiled a list of shared bicycle/bus lanes in cities in the United States and Canada, including facility attributes that are presented in an appendix. Researchers found very few examples of state-level guidance on shared bicycle/bus lanes but more examples at the local and regional levels. These are provided in the report. Through surveys and interviews, the shared bicycle/bus lanes from four cities in the United States were selected for in-depth examination and were developed into case studies: Ocean City, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, D.C. As a result of this investigation, an identification and discussion of the contextual factors, design variables, and tools for planning and implementing shared bicycle/bus lanes is presented. The report provides recommendations for further needed research.

• Record URL:
  • https://doi.org/10.5038/CUTR-NCTR-RR-2011-07
• 
• Summary URL:
  • https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bdk85-977-32-sum.pdf
• Record URL:
  • https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/research/reports/fdot-bdk85-977-32-rpt.pdf
• Record URL:
  • https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/24696
• Supplemental Notes:
  • This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program.
• Corporate Authors:

  National Center for Transit Research

  Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida
  4202 East Fowler Avenue, CUT 100
  Tampa, FL  United States  33620

  Florida Department of Transportation

  Research Center, 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30
  Tallahassee, FL  United States  32399-0450

  Research and Innovative Technology Administration

  1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
  Washington, DC  United States  20590
• Authors:
  • Hillsman, Edward L
  • Hendricks, Sara J
  • Fiebe, JoAnne K
• Publication Date: 2012-7

Language

• English

Media Info

• Media Type: Web
• Edition: Final Report
• Features: Appendices; Figures; Glossary; Maps; Photos; References; Tables;
• Pagination: 167p

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Bicycle lanes; Bicycles; Bus lanes; Case studies; Design; Guidelines; Highway operations; Level of service; Policy; State of the practice; Traffic conflicts; Transit buses
• Candidate Terms: Bicycle vehicle interface
• Uncontrolled Terms: Shared bicycle/bus lanes
• Geographic Terms: Minneapolis (Minnesota); Ocean City (Maryland); Philadelphia (Pennsylvania); Washington (District of Columbia)
• Subject Areas: Design; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Policy; Public Transportation; I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning; I73: Traffic Control;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 01379860
• Record Type: Publication
• Report/Paper Numbers: NCTR 77937/BDK85 977-32
• Contract Numbers: BDK85 977-32; DTRS98-G-0032 (Grant)
• Files: UTC, NTL, TRIS, USDOT, STATEDOT
• Created Date: Aug 7 2012 4:10PM