HALOGEN AND CONVENTIONAL CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN HEADLIGHTS- A COMPARISON OF VISIBILITY DISTANCES
USING VISIBILITY DISTANCE AS A CRITERIUM, HALOGEN AND CONVENTIONAL HIGH AND LOW BEAM HAVE BEEN EXPERIMENTALLY COMPARED IN A SERIES OF FIELD EXPERIMENTS. THE MAIN RESULTS WERE: (1) ON HIGH BEAM WITHOUT OPPOSING LIGHT, THE HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS OFFER ABOUT 25% LONGER VISIBILITY DISTANCES THAN THE CONVENTIONAL HEADLIGHTS; (2) WITH BOTH OPPOSING CARS USING LOW BEAM IT IS A SLIGHT ADVANTAGE TO HAVE HALOGEN HEADLIGHTS; AND (3) THE OPTIMAL DIPPING DISTANCE IS A FUNCTION OF HIGH BEAM SYSTEM (INTENSITY) RATHER THAN LOW BEAM SYSTEM. SMALL DIFFERENCES IN AIMING, ATMOSPHERE ETC. CAUSE LARGER DIFFERENCES IN VISIBILITY DISTANCES THAN DOES HEADLIGHT SYSTEM. /AUTHOR/
-
Supplemental Notes:
- Report 94, 14 PP, 5 FIG, 9 REF
-
Corporate Authors:
Uppsala University, Sweden
Department of Psychology, Tradgardsgaten 20
75220 Uppsala, Sweden -
Authors:
- Rumar, K
- Publication Date: 1970
Subject/Index Terms
- TRT Terms: Distance; Halogens; Headlamps; High beamed headlamps; Low beamed headlamps; Visibility
- Old TRIS Terms: Dipping; High beamed headlights; Low beamed headlights
- Subject Areas: Highways; Safety and Human Factors;
Filing Info
- Accession Number: 00221257
- Record Type: Publication
- Files: TRIS
- Created Date: Apr 25 1971 12:00AM