Transport Research International Documentation (TRID) https://trid.trb.org/ en-us Copyright © 2024. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod) tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod) Transport Research International Documentation (TRID) https://trid.trb.org/Images/PageHeader-wTitle.jpg https://trid.trb.org/ Adaptive Derating Algorithm for EV Application Based-Li-Ion Battery for Safe and Healthy Operation https://trid.trb.org/View/2334766 Tue, 05 Mar 2024 17:12:18 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/2334766 Study on Market Equilibrium of Sealed Supply Chain Based on Willingness to Pay for Food Safety https://trid.trb.org/View/2282150 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:11:01 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/2282150 CASP 2020: Coordinated Activities on the Safety of Products: Child Car Seats: Final Report https://trid.trb.org/View/2145533 Wed, 31 May 2023 10:56:01 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/2145533 A Cross-disciplinary review of product recall research: A stakeholder-stage framework https://trid.trb.org/View/1969603 Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:30:35 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1969603 Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems https://trid.trb.org/View/1876564 Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:30:18 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1876564 Adaptive Test Feedback Loop: A Modeling Approach for Checking Side Effects during Test Execution in Advised Explorative Testing https://trid.trb.org/View/1701131 Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:53:18 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1701131 Safety Concerns Associated with Micromobility Products https://trid.trb.org/View/1711378 Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:28:53 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1711378 The Impact of Social Influence, Technophobia, and Perceived Safety on Autonomous Vehicle Technology Adoption https://trid.trb.org/View/1689443 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:58:23 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1689443 Hazardous Scenarios Identification for Li-Ion Secondary Batteries https://trid.trb.org/View/1513839 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:08:16 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1513839 Differences in the Protective Capabilities of Bicycle Helmets in Real-World and Standard-Specified Impact Scenarios https://trid.trb.org/View/1506548 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:36 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1506548 Communicating the Value and Maintaining Relevance of a Five Star Safety Rating to Consumers and Industry https://trid.trb.org/View/1483606 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:42:28 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1483606 The impact response of traditional and BMX-style bicycle helmets at different impact severities https://trid.trb.org/View/1405590 Fri, 20 May 2016 15:52:10 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1405590 Consumer Rating and Assessment of Safety Helmets for Motorcyclists https://trid.trb.org/View/1360511 250 g. Other dynamic tests were similarly rated. Usability tests included: in- helmet noise, drag forces and ventilation recorded in a wind tunnel on a KEMAR acoustic mannequin at 100 km/h; visor splash and fog resistance; and ease of use. In 2011-12 61 helmets were assessed, the lowest aggregate crash protection score was 21% for an open face helmet and the highest was 74% for a full-face helmet. The lowest aggregate usability score was 32% and the highest 75%. There was no correlation between crash and usability scores, although a few helmets scored highly in both areas. There was a correlation between scores for high and low energy tests onto the flat anvil (r=0.799). There was a negative non-significant correlation between helmet mass and average peak acceleration (g) for all three tests, r=-0.546, r=- 0.414 and r=-0.204, high energy flat anvil, low energy flat anvil and high energy kerb anvil, respectively. The “A” weighted equivalent sound pressure level (LeqA) was derived from wind tunnel tests. The minimum was 95 dB and the maximum 110 dB, with an average of 101 dB, demonstrating large differences in noise generation between helmets. For the eight 2011 CRASH helmets that had been assessed in the SHARP program, there was a modest correlation between the aggregate crash protection score and SHARP star rating (r=0.681). The testing identified differences between helmets largely specific to each test, inferring that each test examined a unique performance aspect. Where possible scores were based on published human tolerance data, including noise, or derived from other standards. In some cases, tolerance data were extrapolated to suit the range of results obtained from the helmet tests, because reference data were not available. An oblique impact test is being considered for inclusion in the CRASH program. The CRASH program provides motorcycle helmet performance and usability information that can assist motorcyclists in purchasing decisions. Further research and development is required to optimise the testing, scoring and rating system of the program, and the communication of results.]]> Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:56:09 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1360511 NHTSA’s Evaluation of a Potential Child Side Impact Test Procedure https://trid.trb.org/View/1360711 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:48:08 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1360711 Comparative Performance of Forward-Facing Child Restraint Systems on the C/FMVSS 213 Bench and Vehicle Seats https://trid.trb.org/View/1323951 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:49:13 GMT https://trid.trb.org/View/1323951