<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transport Research International Documentation (TRID)</title>
    <link>https://trid.trb.org/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://trid.trb.org/Record/RSS?s=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" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <managingEditor>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</webMaster>
    
    <item>
      <title>LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR PREDICTING FUTURE TRAFFIC</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/120717</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A STRONG CASE IS PRESENTED FOR EXAMINING TRAFFIC IN TERMS OF LAND USE. THE PRESENTATION IS MADE WITH ANALYSIS OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) DESCRIBING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LAND USE AND TRAFFIC WHICH INDICATE THAT LAND USE FORECASTING IS A LOGICAL BASIS FOR ESTIMATING FUTURE TRAFFIC, (2) DESCRIBING THE LAND USE SURVEY WHICH IS ESSENTIAL TO DEVELOP THE RELATIONSHIPS NECESSARY FOR FORECASTING, AND (3) DESCRIBING LAND USE FORECASTING TECHNIQUES. THE ESTIMATION OF FUTURE LAND USE BY GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION IS A PREREQUISITE TO PLANNING FUTURE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES BECAUSE TRAFFIC RESULTS FROM THE INTERACTION OF SPATIALLY SEPARATE SPECIALIZED LAND USES. A DETAILED LAND USE SURVEY PROVIDES THE BASIC DATA FROM WHICH CURRENT PATTERNS EMERGE AND ALSO GIVES MEASURES OF THE LOCATION OF PRESENT VACANT LAND AND CURRENT ZONING. ANALYSIS OF THE PRESENT DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVITIES AND INTENSITY OF LAND USE REVEALS A PATTERN WHICH IS HEAVILY ORGANIZED AROUND THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. LAND USE HOLDING CAPACITIES CAN BE ESTIMATED BY SETTING THE FUTURE LAND USE INTENSITY BY ZONE AND MULTIPLYING BY THE PROBABLE AMOUNT OF LAND THAT COULD BE IN USE IF ALL LAND IN A ZONE WERE USED. A POPULATION FORECAST AND AN ECONOMIC FORECASTING MODEL WERE USED TO OBTAIN THE FUTURE AGGREGATE POPULATION AND MANUFACTURING WORKERS. LAND TO SERVE THE POPULATION AND WORKERS IS RESERVED ON A NORMATIVE BASIS. THE ENTIRE LAND USE PATTERN IS THEN REVIEWED TO ENSURE THAT A REASONABLE PATTERN HAS RESULTED. WITH FUTURE LAND ESTIMATED, THE NUMBER OF TRIP DESTINATIONS TO ANY ZONE CAN BE ESTIMATED BY USING TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES BY LAND USE TYPE AND THE AMOUNT OF LAND FOR THE CORRESPONDING USE. THE PROJECTIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A BASIC FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH DETAILED LOCAL LAND USE PLANS AND EXCEPTIONS SHOULD BE WORKED OUT. LAND USE PROJECTIONS SHOULD PROVIDE A BASIS FOR INTEGRATING LAND USE PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING WHICH SHOULD RESULT IN A MORE NEARLY BALANCED RELATION BETWEEN URBAN GROWTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/120717</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COMPARISON OF THREE PARAMETERS OF NONRESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/120598</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THIS PAPER ATTEMPTS TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, WHAT IS THE BEST TYPE OF LAND-USE MEASUREMENT FROM WHICH TO ESTIMATE TRIPS{ THIS QUESTION IS IMPORTANT NOT ONLY FOR TRIP ESTIMATION, BUT ALSO BECAUSE IT DICTATES WHAT TYPE OF LAND- USE SURVEYS A TRANSPORTATION STUDY MUST CONDUCT, AND THESE ARE VERY EXPENSIVE. THE ESTIMATING CAPABILITIES OF THE THREE MOST COMMON MEASURES OF LAND USE-LAND AREA, FLOOR AREA, AND EMPLOYMENT-ARE COMPARED. USING DATA COLLECTED BY THE CHICAGO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY, TRIP RATES BASED ON THESE THREE MEASURES ARE EXAMINED FOR FIVE NONRESIDENTIAL LAND-USE CATEGORIES USING CORRELATION AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS. THE RESULTING COEFFICIENTS AND EQUATIONS ARE GIVEN. THE FINDINGS INDICATE THAT NO ONE OF THESE MEASURES IS BEST FOR ALL LAND- USE CATEGORIES. FLOOR AREA SEEMS BEST FOR COMMERCIAL, EMPLOYMENT FOR MANUFACTURING, AND LAND AREA FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS, PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, AND TRANSPORTATION. CONTRARY TO EXPECTATION, FLOOR AREA DOES NOT SEEM CONSISTENTLY BETTER THAN LAND AREA. FURTHERMORE, FLOOR AREA TRIP RATES ARE NOT UNIFORM THROUGHOUT A METROPOLITAN AREA, BUT INCREASE AS THE DENSITY DECREASES. THE RESULTS SUGGEST THAT FURTHER RESEARCH ON TRIP GENERATION IS NEEDED, UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT IS STILL QUITE FRAGMETARY. FIVE SPECIFIC APPROACHES FOR DEEPER INVESTIGATION ARE RECOMMENDED. IN ADDITION, MORE COMPREHENSIVE SURVEYS OF THE THREE PARAMETERS ARE STILL REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES. /AUTHOR/]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/120598</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CONDUCTING THE EXTERNAL SURVEY</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/118763</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THIS EXTERNAL SURVEY WAS ONE OF THE ORIGIN AND DESTINATION DATA COLLECTION SURVEYS MADE BY THE SEWRPC LAND USE- TRANSPORTATION STUDY. INTERVIEW STATIONS WERE ESTABLISHED ON 34 HIGH VOLUME ROUTES NEAR THEIR POINT OF ENTRY INTO THE REGION. DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED ON THESE ROUTES WHICH CARRIED APPROXIMATELY 85 PERCENT OF ALL TRIPS CROSSING THE EXTERNAL CORDON LINE. RESULTS SHOW THAT 74,397 INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED DURING THE EXTERNAL SURVEY AND THE TOTAL NUMBER AND TYPE OF ALL VEHICLES ENTERING AND LEAVING THE REGION ON A TYPICAL WEEKDAY WERE DETERMINED BY A MANUAL COUNT. THE ORIGIN AND DESTINATION, TYPE OF LAND USE AT BOTH TRIP ENDS, TRIP PURPOSE, AND OTHER INFORMATION WERE OBTAINED FROM THE SAMPLED DRIVERS. REFERENCES' PROCEDURAL MANUAL NO. 4, EXTERNAL SURVEY, SEWRPC, AUGUST 1963.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/118763</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GEOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SYSTEM-TRAVEL AND LAND USE SURVEYS OF 1956</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/118737</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THIS MANUAL DESCRIBES AND DEFINES THE GEOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SYSTEM EMPLOYED BY THE CHICAGO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY. PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED REPORTS HAVE ANALYZED AND REPORTED THE STATISTICAL RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OBTAINED FROM AN ANALYSIS OF STUDY DATA. THE BASIC SURVEY DATA FROM CARDS ARE SHOWN AND RELATED TO THE AREA IN WHICH THEY HAVE PARTICULAR SIGNIFICANCE. THE GENERAL DESIGN OF THE GEOGRAPHIC CARD SYSTEM, THE INDIVIDUAL SURVEYS AND THEIR BASIC IBM CARD FORMS AND UNIQUE CODES PERTINENT TO THESE SURVEYS ARE DISCUSSED AND DESCRIBED. THE CARTOGRAPHATRON IS DISCUSSED INSOFAR AS ITS ELECTRONIC GRID SYSTEM IS RELATED TO THE GEOGRAPHIC CODING SYSTEM.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/118737</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ROUTE 128: A STUDY OF INDUSTRY LOCATION FACTORS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/130529</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG MASSACHUSETTS ROUTE 128 WHICH BYPASSES BOSTON IS ANALYZED, INCLUDING BACKGROUND CAUSES. QUESTIONNAIRES WERE SENT IN SEPTEMBER 1969 TO A RANDOM SAMPLE OF 150, REPRESENTING 20 PERCENT OF THE 729 FIRMS ON THIS ROUTE. THE MOST IMPORTANT LOCATIONAL FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRY HAVE BEEN THE NEED FOR BETTER REGIONAL ACCESS, AVAILABILITY OF LAND TO EXPAND PLANT FACILITIES, NEED FOR PARKING FACILITIES, AND DESIRE FOR AN AESTHETIC LOCATION. /AUTHOR/]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/130529</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TO MAKE A LAND USE INVENTORY AND ITS CHANGE WITH TIME AND TO MAP URBAN AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPING, AND THE ECOLOGICAL IMPACT WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL GOVERNMENT PROJECTS IN CENTRAL MEXICO</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/28544</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The author has identified the following significant results. Comparison between ERTS-1 image scale 1:1,000,000 and CETENAL's charts scale 1:50,000 in irrigated land surface determination in one selected spot gave the following results: Surface on CETENAL's charts 129,900 Has. and arbitrarily we gave 100 percent to this value. Surface on image 122,400 Has., 94.5 percent of the first value. It is necessary to use all four bands to have optimum results on the interpretation. The Principal Investigator made use of photointerpretation techniques only, mostly monoscopically.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/28544</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/464869</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This paper investigates how mixed land-uses influence the commuting choices of residents from large metropolitan areas using data from the 1985 American Housing Survey. The analysis examines the effects of mixed-use levels as well as other features of the built environment like residential densities on three measures of transportation demand: commuting mode choice, commuting distance and household vehicle ownership levels. The effects of land-use environments on mode choice are modeled using binomial logit analysis.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1996 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/464869</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PARATRANSIT AND LAND USE: FACILITY SITING CONSIDERATIONS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/422136</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This study uses written and telephone surveys of social service facilities whose clients include likely paratransit users to determine the extent to which the availability and cost of paratransit services are factored into facility location decisions. Numerous cross tabulations of survey responses are presented. The study also develops a classification of facility types based on their clients' relative use of paratransit services. The study concludes that the availability of transportation is an important factor in social service facilities' location decisions, but that the cost of transportation is not, usually because of third-party payment of the transportation cost. The study suggests that economically efficient location decisions will require that the third-party funders of transportation exert influence on the location decision process.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/422136</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1967 PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF LAND USE AREAS ADJACENT TO INTERCHANGE LIMITS OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/128959</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THIS INTERIM REPORT IS THE THIRD OF A CONTINUING STUDY TO DETECT CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERNS NEAR ALABAMAS INTERSTATE INTERCHANGES. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ON-SITE INSPECTIONS ARE COMBINED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION SUCH AS THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF INTERCHANGE, THE GENERAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA AND NATURE AND EXTENT OF DEVELOPMENT BY QUADRANT. THESE DATA ARE BEING SUPPLEMENTED BY THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE BUREAU PR-1030 SEVERANCE EFFECTS REPORTS WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THOSE INTERCHANGES WHERE SALES OF LAND PARCELS ARE TRANSACTED. /BPR/]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/128959</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FREEWAYS AND RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/93089</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THE INFLUENCE OF FREEWAYS CROSSING THROUGH NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS WAS EVALUATED IN THE NORTH BROADWAY AREA OF SEATTLE, WHICH IS SUBDIVIDED INTO THREE PARTS BY TWO FREEWAYS. DATA WERE COLLECTED ON LAND USE, HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES, AND ACCIDENT HAZARDS. THE ZONING AND LAND USE STUDY REVEALED PRESSURES ARE TENDING TO MAKE THE THREE DIVISIONS INDIVIDUAL PARTS OF THE TOTAL AREA. MOST HOUSE- HOLDERS FELT THE AREA HAD IMPROVED DESPITE DIFFICULTIES IN ACCESS TO SCHOOLS. RESIDENTS OF THE ONE COMMERCIAL AND APARTMENT DIVISION THOUGHT PROPERTY VALUES HAD INCREASED. IN TWO DIVISIONS, SHOPPING CHARACTERISTICS HAD CHANGED. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ACCIDENTS ON ARTERIALS THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE DECREASED. TRAFFIC DECREASE HAS RESULTED IN NEW APART- MENT CONSTRUCTION IN TWO DIVISIONS.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/93089</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>INVENTORYING AN ARTERIAL NETWORK FOR COMPUTER ASSIGNMENT' METHODS AND IMPLICATIONS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/134123</link>
      <description><![CDATA[AS PART OF THE NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION STUDY /AN ELEMENT OF THE UPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION STUDIES/ IT WAS NECESSARY TO RAPIDLY INVENTORY THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY NETWORK OF THE AREA IN NUMERIC FORM, TO ALLOW FOR TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT BY COMPUTER. THE METHOD BY WHICH THE NETWORK OF 2020 NODES AND 3330 LINKS WAS ORGANIZED AND NUMERICALLY CODED IN ONLY TWO MONTHS /1546 MAN HOURS/ IS DESCRIBED. THIS WAS ESSENTIALLY A PAPER SURVEY WITH A MINIMUM AMOUNT OF FIELD WORK TO SUPPLEMENT AVAILABLE DATA ON HIGHWAY AND STREET CHARACTERISTICS. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PROCEDURES USING CAPACITY RESTRAINT TO INCREASE LINK TRAVEL TIME WITH HIGHER VOLUMES WERE EMPLOYED. VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIOS WERE OBTAINED FOR PLANNING STUDIES. A DISCUSSION IS INCLUDED OF THE APPLICATION OF NUMERIC REPRESENTATIONS OF A DETAILED INVENTORY OF A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK TO HIGHWAY LOCATION STUDIES, TRAFFIC COUNTING, MASS TRANSIT AND MODAL SPLIT STUDIES, AND TO INVESTIGATIONS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY SYSTEMS AND LAND USE.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/134123</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1965 PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF LAND USE AREAS ADJACENT TO INTERCHANGE LIMITS OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/123529</link>
      <description><![CDATA[THIS INTERIM REPORT IS THE SECOND OF A CONTINUING STUDY TO DETECT CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERNS NEAR ALABAMAS INTERSTATE INTERCHANGES. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND ON-SITE INSPECTIONS ARE COMBINED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION SUCH AS THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF INTERCHANGE, THE GENERAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT OF THE AREA AND NATURE AND EXTENT OF DEVELOPMENT BY QUADRANT. THESE DATA ARE BEING SUPPLEMENTED BY THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE BUREAUS PR-1030 SEVERANCE FORMS WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THOSE INTERCHANGES WHERE SALES OF LAND PARCELS ARE TRANSACTED. /BPR/]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/123529</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/130577</link>
      <description><![CDATA[CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS, BRITTON HARRIS OPENING STATEMENTS, EDWARD H. HOLMES, WILLIAM B. ROSS AGENCY EXPECTATIONS FROM PREDICTIVE MODELS, CHARLES J. ZWICK PLANNING, DECISION-MAKING, AND THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PLAN EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES: SOME ASPECTS OF DECISION REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYTICAL RESPONSE, WILBUR A. STEGER AND T. R. LAKSHMANAN ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AS A SOURCE OF INPUTS FOR LAND USE MODELS, F. STUART CHAPIN, JR. TOWARD A THEORY OF THE CITY, CHARLES LEVEN GENERAL DISCUSSION OF PART II DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF MODELS SEVEN MODELS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT: A STRUCTURAL COMPARISON, IRA S. LOWRY ACCESS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT, MORTON SCHNEIDER THE QUALITY OF DATA AND THE CHOICE AND DESIGN OF PREDICTIVE MODELS, WILLIAM ALONSO CONSTRUCTION OF MODELS, KENNETH SCHLAGER, BRITTON HARRIS, T. R. LAKSHMANAN, BORIS PUSHKAREV USE OF MODELS SURVEY OF PLANNING AGENCY EXPERIENCE WITH URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS, DATA PROCESSING, AND COMPUTERS, GEORGE C. HEMMENS EVALUATION OF LAND USE PATTERNS, JOHN R. HAMBURG, ROGER L. CREIGHTON, ROBERT S. SCOTT COMMUNICATION IN THE FIELD OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS, DAVID E. BOYCE.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/130577</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SELECTED REFERENCES ON LAND USE INVENTORY METHODS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/130507</link>
      <description><![CDATA[EIGHTY-THREE REFERENCES ARE PRESENTED ON LAND USE STUDIES. LAND USE METHODOLOGY IS IN A RAPID STATE OF EVOLUTION. THE THREE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF A LAND USE INVENTORY APPEAR TO BE: (1) PLACE, OR SOME FORM OF GEOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION, (2) A MEASURE OF QUANTITY OR INTENSITY, SUCH AS AREA OF THE PARCEL, AND (3) CLASSIFICATION OF THE LAND USE OR ACTIVITY THROUGH A CODING SYSTEM. THESE COMPONENTS APPEAR IN MULTIPLE IN RECENT LAND USE SURVEYS. DISCUSSION IS MADE OF INVENTORY METHOD, UNITS OF COLLECTION, QUANTIFICATION OF DATA, CLASSIFICATION AND CODING, DATA HANDLING, TABULATION OF DATA, MAPPING AND ADMINISTRATION.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/130507</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DETERMINING URBAN GROWTH AND CHANGE FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH COMPARISONS</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/93392</link>
      <description><![CDATA[AN EXPLORATION WAS MADE OF THE UTILITY OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY INTERPRETATION MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS AS A MEANS FOR DETERMINING URBAN GROWTH AND CHANGES IN PAST PERIODS. AS A WORKING TOOL FOR THIS PURPOSE, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IS UNEXCELLED. WHEN PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION IS MADE WITH SECONDARY SOURCE DATA THE ACCURACY OF URBAN LAND USE INTERPRETATION CAN BE AS DETAILED AS REQUIRED AND CAN ACCURATELY PORTRAY CHANGING LOCATIONAL TENDENCIES OF LAND USE OVER TIME. FROM LAND USE MEASUREMENTS THE QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF LAND USE CHANGES CAN BE DETERMINED AND COMPARED WITH CHANGES IN OTHER KEY GROWTH INDICES. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS PROVIDE A FIRM BASIS FOR ALLOCATING LAND USE FORECASTS AND FOR CHECKING THEIR ACCURACY THROUGH PERIODIC AERIAL RESURVEYS. THIS INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY THE PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY ADDS AN IMPORTANT FUNCTION TO THE GROWING NUMBER OF USES MADE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN EXAMINING THE PROBLEMS OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN SOCIETY.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1994 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/93392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>