<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transport Research International Documentation (TRID)</title>
    <link>https://trid.trb.org/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://trid.trb.org/Record/RSS?s=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" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <managingEditor>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</webMaster>
    
    <item>
      <title>Learning from the evidence: insights for regulating e-scooters</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/2306727</link>
      <description><![CDATA[As a trending mobility choice, e-scooters have become popular in many cities. Many authorities have initiated shared e-scooter trial schemes to assess the feasibility of the vehicles prior to enacting official legalisation. This paper aims to provide an evidence review of shared e-scooters and investigate how existing evidence may inform long-term policies. This carries significant relevance for jurisdictions that are in a conflicting position with e-scooters, such as New South Wales (NSW), Australia whose context motivates this study. The evidence review focuses on three themes derived from experience with shared e-scooters within the broader micromobility landscape, namely: safety; where shared e-scooters fit into the modal landscape; and the environmental impacts. Findings confirm that ensuring the safety of shared e-scooters requires complex solutions, which may include a clear regulatory framework for e-scooters, safety education and skill training, innovative data collection and analysis methods, and an approach to safety management that is user-based, location-based, and time-based. In terms of modal fit policymakers should encourage first and last-mile combinations with public transport, with consideration of user characteristics; while environmental impact is strongly correlated to the mode replaced by e-scooter trips. The paper provides insights for policymakers on the regulation and positioning of shared e-scooters.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 14:49:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/2306727</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving road safety in Australia</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1756382</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The committee was established to inquire into and report on the steps that can be taken to reduce Australia's road accident rates, and investigate the impact of trauma and death on our roads. It would inquire into and report on: (a) the effectiveness of existing road safety support services and programs, including opportunities to integrate Safe System principles into health, education, industry and transport policy; (b) the impact of road trauma on the nation, including the importance of achieving zero deaths and serious injuries in remote and regional areas; (c) the possible establishment of a future parliamentary Standing Committee on Road Safety and its functions; (d) measures to ensure state, territory and local government road infrastructure investment incorporates the Safe System principles; (e) road trauma and incident data collection and coordination across Australia; (f) recommending strategies, performance measures and targets for the next National Road Safety Strategy; (g) recommendations for the role of the newly established Office of Road Safety; and (h) other measures to support the Australian Parliament’s ongoing resolve to reduce incidents on our roads, with a focus on the recommendations from the Inquiry into the effectiveness of the National Road Safety Strategy 2011–2020.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 08:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1756382</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Safe system into practice workshop</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1236898</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Vision Zero is an aspiration to have no fatalities or non-recoverable injuries related to road travel.  Safe system is a set of principles intended to ensure that no road user is subject to impact forces in a traffic collision from which they cannot make a complete recovery.  The ACT has adopted Vision Zero as a long-term goal for its road system and Safe System as the guiding principles through which it can be achieved.  Most road authorities, including Roads ACT, have yet to come to grips with applying safe system principles in everyday practice.  The project set out with the aim of assisting bodies in the ACT to start introducing safe system into everyday practice by getting work groups to develop their own to a plan for the application of safe system to their practice.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:42:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1236898</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>project+ (on Track and on Q): the project management development project</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1211734</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1211734</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supporting training and education in the transport industry</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1202364</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1202364</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Australasian Traffic Education Conference: the scope of traffic education</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1202278</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1202278</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Professionals and transport policy: a perspective for post graduates</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1194612</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The nature of transport analysis is such that a very wide range of technical disciplines are involved.  The training of engineer and other professionals does not generally make much time available for the intensive range of technical courses to be placed in context for the students.  The policy, evaluation and other practical environmental factors strongly condition the application of professional skills in transport, and the value systems of other disciplines have an early powerful impact on technical workers in transport and planning.  This report is the result of several years of post experience education in the post experience masters course in transport engineering led by the authors at monash university, and the effectiveness of the package in altering the student's practical professional perspective in the workplace has been the main force behind the production of this documented version of the materials and methods used (a).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1194612</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bicycle Institute of Victoria submission on traffic safety education</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1191574</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The bicycle institute of Victoria (biv) is a non profit community group of over 1,000 cyclists who seek to promote the safe use of bicycles and represent the interests of 850,000 non competitive cyclists in Victoria, particularly the child cyclists.  This submission outlines six issues of particular concern to the biv: 1.  States the long term traffic/ bicycle safety education policy required to meet the needs of cyclists as unprotected road users, and advocates the concept that the safe cyclist of today is the safe motorist of tomorrow.  2.  Sets out the basic facts about increased bicycle usage, accidents and the consequent need to educate school children and create correct attitudes to the use of vehicles on the road at an early age.  3. Advocates the need for the Victorian bike ed program to be introduced into all Victorian schools and for a means to be found of selling 'low cost/ high quality' bicycle helmets during the conduct of the bike ed program.  4. Advocates the need for a school based traffic/ bicycle safety education program for 6 to 9 year olds, that also teaches young cyclists to be respectful of the needs of pedestrians when riding on the footpath.  5. Advocates the need for an advanced (classroom and on road) bicycle riding course for 13 to 16 year olds and the encouragement of bicycle racing and bicycle touring as an important form of pre driver education.  6.  Advocates the need for interstate and commonwealth cooperation in the development of traffic/ bicycle safety education materials and research programs to evaluate the educational and safety benefits of these materials (a).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1191574</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Management of drink drive offenders in Victoria, Australia</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1169519</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1169519</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The ACT road environment and the ACT young driver: findings from the ACT on-scene crash study</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1164692</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1164692</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Summit dinner address</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1164024</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:35:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1164024</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The way ahead: road safety directions for youth in Western Australia</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/1156958</link>
      <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 02:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/1156958</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. OCEAN POLICY IN THE 1970S: STATUS AND ISSUES. POLICY OVERVIEW</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/82819</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The study that is highlighted in this summary, U.S. Ocean Policy in the 1970s: Status and Issues, is the result of the first extensive review of national ocean affairs since 1969. The contents of this study consider the Nation's overall stake in its ocean and coastal resources and review the status of the six major elements of U.S. ocean policy: marine fisheries; coastal resources; the marine environment; marine science and technology; marine transportation; and marine employment, education, and training. The study also considered the organizational structure that is employed by the Federal Government in carrying out the national ocean effort.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 1979 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/82819</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. OCEAN POLICY IN THE 1970S: STATUS AND ISSUES</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/82820</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This report discusses current ocean policies in each major area of civilian ocean and coastal affairs, provides background information on the evolution of policies, describes and appraises the status of Federal ocean programs, identifies issues that need to be resolved, and reviews recommendations that have been made by various advisory commissions, councils, and other groups, including legislative proposals where appropriate. Some of the principal issues discussed are: fisheries, coastal resources, wetlands, siting electric power plants, recreation, hazards, mining, marine transportation, education, and marine science and technology.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 1979 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/82820</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THE DESIGN OF SHIPBOARD ORGANISATION: SOME EXPERIENCES WITH A MATRIX-TYPE OF ORGANISATION IN NORWAY</title>
      <link>https://trid.trb.org/View/71907</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The experimental project described is designed to meet the challenge of social and technology developments to the existing shipboard organization.  The general raising of educational standards coupled with the "de-skilling" of jobs on board ship have posed many problems in the management of seafaring manpower, both in Norway and the other major shipping industries in Europe.  Much research has been undertaken into seafaring, and the Work Research Institute in Norway has developed a strategy known as action research, which differs from social research science in several respects, for example: 1. The complex interrelatedness of the system at hand is explicitly recognized.  2. An attempt is made to change one or two significant variables and observe the outcome.  The changes are then adopted and adapted and new directions for development found.  3. Both researcher and client collaborate in learning how to bring about change and to formulate desirable changes.  Reshaped policies are thus much more readily adopted.  The first project within this action research strategy was with the Leif Hoegh Company on board the Hoegh Mistral and was designed to enhance the technical content of the ratings' jobs and their career prospects.  The second major application of this approach was to the skill content and work organization of officers' jobs.  Pressures on the existing ship organization are briefly commented on.  Two alternative organizational models: the Operation/Maintenance Model and the Matrix type of organization on board the Hoegh Multina are then described, together with the experiences of working within the Matrix system.  Order from: BSRA as No. 47547.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1978 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://trid.trb.org/View/71907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>