A Contractor’s Perspective on the PWL Challenge

This paper provides a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of using hot mix asphalt (HMA) specifications incorporating the percent within limits (PWL) methodology from a contractor’s perspective. Since the Federal regulations changed in 1995, requiring each State Highway Agency (SHA) to have in place an approved quality assurance (QA) program for materials used in Federal-Aid highway construction projects, many public agencies have transitioned from using method specifications to QA specifications. There are clearly some advantages, but unfortunately there are also several disadvantages associated with the use of the PWL methodology. There are basically two categories of disadvantages. One category includes the specific disadvantages associated with QA specifications themselves and the other category deals with the implementation of quality assurance specifications. In addition to a general discussion of advantages and disadvantages, specific examples are provided of both types experienced by a relatively large national contractor. Fortunately, over the past few years, both owner/agency and material supplier/contractor groups have recognized many of the disadvantages and these have been more clearly identified, understood, and are being addressed. The paper concludes with a series of unanswered questions, which challenge the basic philosophy for using the current QA specifications.

Language

  • English

Media Info

Subject/Index Terms

Filing Info

  • Accession Number: 01041374
  • Record Type: Publication
  • Files: TRIS
  • Created Date: Jan 30 2007 1:29PM